<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: more spending?</title>
	<link>http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/archives/2005/04/27/more-spending/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/archives/2005/04/27/more-spending/#comment-8593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/archives/2005/04/27/more-spending/#comment-8593</guid>
		<description>I never read so much whining as I did on appleinsider.  I mean, the new 2.7Ghz is 8% "faster", comes with 250GB instead of 180 and has a new 16x dual layer drive.  An incremental update and, if you bought a 2.5 with 250GB and 16x drive (assuming it was available) it would've been about $200 more.

I think Apple could release a 3.0Ghz tomorrow if they wanted to.  But it would be liquid cooled and I suspect they're waiting for a CPU that can be air cooled without high-speed/high-noise fans.  They're all about design and not the bleeding edge.

Oh...love the comment about moving to AMD.  Uh, yeah.  Even if IBM would sell AMD a license to build PPC they'd need to tool for it.  Not a small investment for what amounts to less than 10% of the CPU market.  Not sure that the ROI would be sufficient.  And moving to x86 means re-writing all of Mac OS X owing to endian issues.  Boneheads.  :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never read so much whining as I did on appleinsider.  I mean, the new 2.7Ghz is 8% &#8220;faster&#8221;, comes with 250GB instead of 180 and has a new 16x dual layer drive.  An incremental update and, if you bought a 2.5 with 250GB and 16x drive (assuming it was available) it would&#8217;ve been about $200 more.</p>
<p>I think Apple could release a 3.0Ghz tomorrow if they wanted to.  But it would be liquid cooled and I suspect they&#8217;re waiting for a CPU that can be air cooled without high-speed/high-noise fans.  They&#8217;re all about design and not the bleeding edge.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230;love the comment about moving to AMD.  Uh, yeah.  Even if IBM would sell AMD a license to build PPC they&#8217;d need to tool for it.  Not a small investment for what amounts to less than 10% of the CPU market.  Not sure that the ROI would be sufficient.  And moving to x86 means re-writing all of Mac OS X owing to endian issues.  Boneheads.  <img src='http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hkmacs</title>
		<link>http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/archives/2005/04/27/more-spending/#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>hkmacs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.shakykaiser.com/blog/archives/2005/04/27/more-spending/#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>At the launch of the G5, they promised 3GHz within a year. Not there yet, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the launch of the G5, they promised 3GHz within a year. Not there yet, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
